linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] large atomic writes for xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cdf83383-8595-447c-9d24-891e850cab56@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 06:04:47 +0100
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: hch@....de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, dchinner@...hat.com,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@...il.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@...cle.com,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, brauner@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        jack@...e.cz, cem@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] large atomic writes for xfs

On 01/05/2025 05:31, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 03:14:04PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> At this point, is your only issue now with
>> 05/15 xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block
>> ?
>>
>> I am not sure on 15/15...
> 
> This series still needs reviews of patches 2, 3, 5, and 15, if I'm not
> mistaken.

I can review 2 and 3, but I am not familiar with the code so I don't 
think that there is much value in that. I feel that very few are. So who 
else will?