linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2220249.irdbgypaU6@jernej-laptop>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 07:05:19 +0200
From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi-ng: fix order of arguments in clock macro

Dne sreda, 30. april 2025 ob 11:53:25 Srednjeevropski poletni čas je Andre Przywara napisal(a):
> When introducing the SUNXI_CCU_MP_DATA_WITH_MUX_GATE_FEAT macro, the order
> of the last two arguments was different between the users and the
> definition: features became flags and flags became features.
> 
> This just didn't end up in a desaster yet because most users ended up
> passing 0 for both arguments, and other clocks (for the new A523 SoC) are
> not yet used.
> 
> Swap the order of the arguments in the definition, so that users stay
> untouched.
> 
> Fixes: cdbb9d0d09db ("clk: sunxi-ng: mp: provide wrappers for setting feature flags")
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>

Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>

Best regards,
Jernej