[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e7ad2d6-4056-4d39-88df-183803ae35ec@lucifer.local>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 11:40:40 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Hajime Tazaki <thehajime@...il.com>, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
ricarkol@...gle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, richard@....at,
anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] nommu UML
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 14:23 +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > Thanks, appreciate the response. I would say send a v8 that's rebased to
> > make life easier for maintainers :) if you already have it ready to go that
> > is!
>
> There probably haven't been that many patches since, but I guess why not
> :)
Appreciate you having a look again! :>)
Perhaps I'm being selfish :P but it at least needs a rebase, perhaps just a
trivial one, as b4 shazam refused to play ball when I tried.
>
> I was sort of hoping to get the seccomp patches from Benjamin - that
> have been waiting far longer - in first to see what overlap if any there
> might be, but I think he and Hajime have already concluded there wasn't
> all that much overlap anyway.
Ah thanks for the insight, hopefully not too much friction on that.
>
> But it's good to hear that it'd be useful to you.
Yeah, I (for one) at least struggle with a workable nommu setup, I had a
buildroot for m68k-nommu but it broke in various unpleasant ways, so having
something really straightforward would be hugely helpful.
>
> johannes
Cheers, Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists