[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aBS4QRuKeZ1IpJvN@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 14:19:13 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
Cc: "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wbg@...nel.org" <wbg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: interrupt-cnt: Convert atomic_t -> atomic_long_t
Hi Alexander,
On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:24:18AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 17:22 +0200, A. Sverdlin wrote:
> > From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
> >
> > Convert the internal counter type to atomic_long_t, which:
> > - doesn't change much for existing in-tree users as they are 32-bit anyway
> > (stm32/i.MX6)
> > - doesn't introduce performace penalty on 32-bit platforms
> > - provides 64-bit resolution on 64-bit platforms with virtually no
> > preformance penalty
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>
>
> I've noticed that the patch has been marked as "Changes Requested" in
> the patchwork, could it be a mistake? Because I never received any
> change request.
Sorry for delay
Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists