[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <qgojusp6c5mglve35sgncwpuft2flnvfysstbyieysktdlxwp3@lp73etm4zzai>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 08:46:31 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@...il.com>,
Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <quic_kdybcio@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e80100-*: Drop useless DP3
compatible override
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 12:39:13PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 25-04-30 01:26:13, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:42:28AM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > It all started with the support for CRD back when we had different
> > > compatibles for eDP and DP. Meanwhile, that has been sorted out and it
> > > is now figured out at runtime while using only the DP compatible.
> > >
> > > It's almost funny how this got copied over from CRD and spread to all
> > > X Elite platforms.
> > >
> > > TBH, the best reason to drop it ASAP is to make sure this doesn't spread
> > > beyond X Elite to newer platforms.
> > >
> > > Functionally nothing changes.
> >
> > Looking at the diff I wonder if this part should also be simplified:
> >
> > /delete-property/ #sound-dai-cells;
> >
> > This is done by all upstream X1E boards, so maybe just drop the
> > #sound-dai-cells directly in x1e80100.dtsi?
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure about that.
>
> Though the DP3 PHY is currently used as eDP, I think it could be used
> as DP. So I think it makes more sense to keep the DP3 controller as is
> in the SoC dtsi and delete the #sound-dai-cells property in each board
> specific dts. Don't know if it will ever be the case with this SoC, but
> maybe someone will use DP3 with the PHY configured as DP rather than
> eDP.
>
> Not sure if I'm 100% right about this though.
>
> Dmitry, Bjorn, do you think that is accurate enough?
Yes, this sounds logical. DP3 is repurposed for eDP on a board level, so
the SoC configuration should not contain any specific config for that
port.
>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > -- Sebastian
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists