lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250504164902.69901e8a@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 16:49:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>, Jonathan Cameron
 <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: accel: fxls8962af: Fix sign temperature
 scan element

On Sat, 3 May 2025 10:57:09 -0300
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com> wrote:

> On 05/02, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> > TEMP_OUT register contains the 8-bit, 2's complement temperature value.
> > Let's mark the temperature scan element signed.
> > 
> > Fixes: a3e0b51884ee ("iio: accel: add support for FXLS8962AF/FXLS8964AF accelerometers")
> > Suggested-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>  
> 
> Sort of nitpinking but I think the commit description could be more assertive.

Agreed.  I might have just tweaked it to
"Mark the temperature element signed."  + some of what Marcelo has below.
but given Andy's request on patch 1 means you are probably doing a v3, please
tidy this up as well.

Thanks and good catches on both of them!

Jonathan

> The main idea is that we want to make the scan element signed because the
> data read from the TEMP_OUT register is in two's complement format and not
> having the scan element marked as a signed number may cause it to be mishandled
> and miss displayed. Nevertheless, I do think the patch is good so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ