linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 06/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2191c270-f4fc-47e4-8bb7-ba6329332ef3@quicinc.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 21:22:06 +0530
From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: <vkoul@...nel.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
        <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
        <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        <quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 06/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off



On 5/4/2025 9:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 09:54:35PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>> Rename qmp_ufs_disable to qmp_ufs_power_off to better represent its
>> functionality. Additionally, move the qmp_ufs_exit() call inside
>> qmp_ufs_power_off to preserve the functionality of .power_off.
>>
>> There is no functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 30 +++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> index 94095393148c..c501223fc5f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> @@ -1835,6 +1835,15 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy)
>> +{
>> +	struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> +
>> +	qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp);
> 
> Just inline it, unless you have any other plans.

Hi Dmitry,

I have inlined qcom_ufs_com_exit in patch #7 of the same series. I 
separated it into a different patch to keep each patch simpler.

Could you please review patch #7 and share your thoughts.

[PATCH V4 07/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline 
qmp_ufs_com_exit().


Regards,
Nitin


> 
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>>   {
>>   	struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> @@ -1851,28 +1860,11 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy)
>>   	qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL],
>>   			SW_PWRDN);
>>
>> -	return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int qmp_ufs_exit(struct phy *phy)
>> -{
>> -	struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> -
>> -	qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp);
>> +	qmp_ufs_exit(phy);
>>
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -static int qmp_ufs_disable(struct phy *phy)
>> -{
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	ret = qmp_ufs_power_off(phy);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -	return qmp_ufs_exit(phy);
>> -}
>> -
>>   static int qmp_ufs_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode)
>>   {
>>   	struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> @@ -1921,7 +1913,7 @@ static int qmp_ufs_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>>   static const struct phy_ops qcom_qmp_ufs_phy_ops = {
>>   	.init		= qmp_ufs_phy_init,
>>   	.power_on	= qmp_ufs_power_on,
>> -	.power_off	= qmp_ufs_disable,
>> +	.power_off	= qmp_ufs_power_off,
>>   	.calibrate	= qmp_ufs_phy_calibrate,
>>   	.set_mode	= qmp_ufs_set_mode,
>>   	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
>