[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72k3ozKkLMinTLQwvkyg9K=BeRxs1oYZSKhJHY-veEyZdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 12:25:03 +0200
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@...il.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, a.hindborg@...nel.org, alex.bennee@...aro.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com, anisse@...ier.eu,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
bqe@...gle.com, dakr@...nel.org, dakr@...hat.com,
daniel.almeida@...labora.com, gary@...yguo.net, joakim.bech@...aro.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, nm@...com,
ojeda@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
tmgross@...ch.edu, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, vireshk@...nel.org,
yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 00/15] Rust abstractions for clk, cpumask, cpufreq, OPP
On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 12:15 PM Andrew Ballance
<andrewjballance@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I have tried building the latest linux-next and I think that this
> patch series causes a build error with the defconfig for x86_64.
Yeah, I also see it in the latest `linux-next` runs.
And in arm64, it builds, but I see a doctest failure too:
[ 1.014106] # rust_doctest_kernel_cpumask_rs_0.location:
rust/kernel/cpumask.rs:180
[ 1.015226] # rust_doctest_kernel_cpumask_rs_0: ASSERTION
FAILED at rust/kernel/cpumask.rs:190
[ 1.015226] Expected mask.weight() == 2 to be true, but is false
[ 1.017326] not ok 40 rust_doctest_kernel_cpumask_rs_0
Viresh: could you please make sure `defconfig`s (and `allmodconfig`s)
are clean? (including with debug assertions and doctests enabled) We
will very soon be putting more things into next for the merge window.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists