linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: describe SA8255p

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8def8f5d-3bc6-4ca3-85bf-f55dc7dc7d9c@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 20:25:35 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com, quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com,
 quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com, quic_arandive@...cinc.com,
 quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com, quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com,
 Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] dt-bindings: qcom: geni-se: describe SA8255p

On 06/05/2025 20:02, Praveen Talari wrote:
> From: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
> 
> SA8255p platform abstracts resources such as clocks, interconnect
> configuration in Firmware.
> 
> Add DT bindings for the QUP Wrapper on sa8255p platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
You are wasting people's time, srsly, replying without giving any chance
to comment and then totally ignoring review.

Reach to your colleagues before sending next version to be sure you
understand the process.

<form letter>
It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof