[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35659475-862a-4678-a2a5-173c2254ae60@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 20:23:26 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: psodagud@...cinc.com, djaggi@...cinc.com, quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com,
quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com, quic_arandive@...cinc.com,
quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com, quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com,
Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p
On 06/05/2025 20:02, Praveen Talari wrote:
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,sa8255p-geni-uart
> + - qcom,sa8255p-geni-debug-uart
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + minItems: 1
Nothing changed here, this should be dropped based on previous discussion.
You sent this v5 on 8:02 PM of my time. *THEN* you responded to my
comment at v4 at 8:05 PM. That's the way to waste everyone's time.
I do not understand why interrupt is optional for a new, complete device
description.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists