linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] Enable CXL PCIe port protocol error handling and logging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aBqV9UCF6dQFtcyP@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 19:06:29 -0400
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, nifan.cxl@...il.com, dave@...olabs.net,
	jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, dave.jiang@...el.com,
	alison.schofield@...el.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, mahesh@...ux.ibm.com,
	ira.weiny@...el.com, oohall@...il.com, Benjamin.Cheatham@....com,
	rrichter@....com, nathan.fontenot@....com,
	Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, lukas@...ner.de,
	ming.li@...omail.com, PradeepVineshReddy.Kodamati@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] Enable CXL PCIe port protocol error handling
 and logging

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 08:47:01PM -0500, Terry Bowman wrote:
> This patchset updates CXL Protocol Error handling for CXL Ports and CXL
> Endpoints (EP). The reach of this patchset grew from CXL Ports to include
> EPs as well because updating the handling for all devices is preferable
> over supporting multiple handling paths.
> 
> This patchset is a continuation of v7 and can be found here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20250211192444.2292833-1-terry.bowman@amd.com/
> 

I've been testing this for stability on a fair number of boxes for some
time - backported to v6.13. Haven't seen any major issues related to
this set in that time. Outside my normal wheelhouse, but for the sake
of runtime stability:

Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>

Trying to get more explicit testing feedback from RAS folks.

(note: there appears to be some conflicting changes in v6.15-rc4+ that
a bit outside my current timeline to forward port and test.)

~Gregory