| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <aBuKsolD-4_yzcZM@p14s>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 10:30:42 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, afd@...com, hnagalla@...com, u-kumar1@...com,
jm@...com, jan.kiszka@...mens.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
jkangas@...hat.com, eballetbo@...hat.com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/35] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use k3_r5_rproc_mem_data
structure for memory info
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 04:11:07PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> The ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c driver previously hardcoded device memory
> region addresses and names. Change this to use the k3_r5_rproc_mem_data
> structure to store memory information. This aligns with K3 DSP and M4
> drivers, and can be refactored out later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
> Tested-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
> ---
> v11: Changelog:
> 1. Carried T/B tag.
>
> Link to v10:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250417182001.3903905-8-b-padhi@ti.com/
>
> v10: Changelog:
> 1. Collected R/B from v9 version of this patch.
>
> Link to v9:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317120622.1746415-4-b-padhi@ti.com/
>
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> index 5a460cfdfb4c4..e2dd5c38a0668 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
> @@ -84,18 +84,44 @@ enum cluster_mode {
> CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECORE
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct k3_r5_mem_data - memory definitions for a R5
> + * @name: name for this memory entry
> + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
> + */
> +struct k3_r5_mem_data {
> + const char *name;
> + const u32 dev_addr;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_r5_dev_data - device data structure for a R5
> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a R5
> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> + */
> +struct k3_r5_dev_data {
> + const struct k3_r5_mem_data *mems;
> + u32 num_mems;
> + u32 boot_align_addr;
> + bool uses_lreset;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct k3_r5_soc_data - match data to handle SoC variations
> * @tcm_is_double: flag to denote the larger unified TCMs in certain modes
> * @tcm_ecc_autoinit: flag to denote the auto-initialization of TCMs for ECC
> * @single_cpu_mode: flag to denote if SoC/IP supports Single-CPU mode
> * @is_single_core: flag to denote if SoC/IP has only single core R5
> + * @core_data: pointer to R5-core-specific device data
> */
> struct k3_r5_soc_data {
> bool tcm_is_double;
> bool tcm_ecc_autoinit;
> bool single_cpu_mode;
> bool is_single_core;
> + const struct k3_r5_dev_data *core_data;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -151,6 +177,7 @@ struct k3_r5_core {
> * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
> * @reset: reset control handle
> + * @data: pointer to R5-core-specific device data
> * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
> * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
> * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> @@ -166,6 +193,7 @@ struct k3_r5_rproc {
> struct k3_r5_mem *rmem;
> int num_rmems;
> struct reset_control *reset;
> + const struct k3_r5_dev_data *data;
> struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> u32 ti_sci_id;
> @@ -1235,31 +1263,32 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
> static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
> {
> - static const char * const mem_names[] = {"atcm", "btcm"};
> + const struct k3_r5_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->priv;
> struct resource *res;
> int num_mems;
> int i;
>
> - num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names);
> - kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(dev, num_mems, sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
num_mems = data->num_mems;
If this is the only thing I find then it is not worth a new revision. Let's see
how things play out. More comments to come.
Mathieu
> + kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems, sizeof(*kproc->mem),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!kproc->mem)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> if (!res) {
> dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res),
> dev_name(dev))) {
> dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> @@ -1273,7 +1302,8 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res));
> if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n", mem_names[i]);
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> @@ -1286,7 +1316,7 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> * addresses 0 and 0x41010000 (same as the bus address on AM65x
> * SoCs) based on loczrama setting
> */
> - if (!strcmp(mem_names[i], "atcm")) {
> + if (!strcmp(data->mems[i].name, "atcm")) {
> kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = core->loczrama ?
> 0 : K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR;
> } else {
> @@ -1296,7 +1326,7 @@ static int k3_r5_core_of_get_internal_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "memory %5s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> - mem_names[i], &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
> kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
> }
> @@ -1408,6 +1438,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> kproc->priv = core;
> kproc->dev = cdev;
> kproc->rproc = rproc;
> + kproc->data = cluster->soc_data->core_data;
> core->kproc = kproc;
>
> kproc->ti_sci = devm_ti_sci_get_by_phandle(cdev, "ti,sci");
> @@ -1772,11 +1803,24 @@ static int k3_r5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct k3_r5_mem_data r5_mems[] = {
> + { .name = "atcm", .dev_addr = 0x0 },
> + { .name = "btcm", .dev_addr = K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct k3_r5_dev_data r5_data = {
> + .mems = r5_mems,
> + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(r5_mems),
> + .boot_align_addr = 0,
> + .uses_lreset = true,
> +};
> +
> static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am65_j721e_soc_data = {
> .tcm_is_double = false,
> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = false,
> .single_cpu_mode = false,
> .is_single_core = false,
> + .core_data = &r5_data,
> };
>
> static const struct k3_r5_soc_data j7200_j721s2_soc_data = {
> @@ -1784,6 +1828,7 @@ static const struct k3_r5_soc_data j7200_j721s2_soc_data = {
> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true,
> .single_cpu_mode = false,
> .is_single_core = false,
> + .core_data = &r5_data,
> };
>
> static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am64_soc_data = {
> @@ -1791,6 +1836,7 @@ static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am64_soc_data = {
> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true,
> .single_cpu_mode = true,
> .is_single_core = false,
> + .core_data = &r5_data,
> };
>
> static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am62_soc_data = {
> @@ -1798,6 +1844,7 @@ static const struct k3_r5_soc_data am62_soc_data = {
> .tcm_ecc_autoinit = true,
> .single_cpu_mode = false,
> .is_single_core = true,
> + .core_data = &r5_data,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id k3_r5_of_match[] = {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists