linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Set dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <MN0PR12MB5953671CE77EE1658DFEBA49B788A@MN0PR12MB5953.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 11:02:21 +0000
From: "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
To: Geßler, Thomas <thomas.gessler@...eckmann-gmbh.de>
CC: "dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, Vinod Koul
	<vkoul@...nel.org>, "Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>, Marek Vasut
	<marex@...x.de>, Uwe Kleine-König
	<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Katakam, Harini" <harini.katakam@....com>,
	"Gupta, Suraj" <Suraj.Gupta2@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Set dma_device directions

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geßler, Thomas <thomas.gessler@...eckmann-gmbh.de>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 4:29 PM
> To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
> Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org; Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>; Simek, Michal
> <michal.simek@....com>; Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>; Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Katakam, Harini <harini.katakam@....com>; Gupta,
> Suraj <Suraj.Gupta2@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Set dma_device directions
>
> ----- Am 7. Mai 2025 um 12:20 schrieb Pandey, Radhey Shyam
> radhey.shyam.pandey@....com:
> > Suraj also worked on this patch internally and he did set direction in
> > chan_probe().
> > So, I think we can switch to below implementation ?
>
> That's fine by me.

If you can respin v2 with it that would be great.

Thanks,
Radhey