[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1814404629.486377.1746615560560.JavaMail.zimbra@brueckmann-gmbh.de>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 12:59:20 +0200 (CEST)
From: Geßler, Thomas <thomas.gessler@...eckmann-gmbh.de>
To: "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Cc: dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"Simek, Michal" <michal.simek@....com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Katakam, Harini" <harini.katakam@....com>,
"Gupta, Suraj" <Suraj.Gupta2@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Set dma_device directions
----- Am 7. Mai 2025 um 12:20 schrieb Pandey, Radhey Shyam radhey.shyam.pandey@....com:
> Suraj also worked on this patch internally and he did set direction in
> chan_probe().
> So, I think we can switch to below implementation ?
That's fine by me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists