[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ca2b66c-b156-4255-bc79-c1b1a5a0338e@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 20:37:45 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>, "Maciej
Wieczor-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman
<peternewman@...gle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin
<Dave.Martin@....com>, Anil Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/31] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon()
ready for new domain types
Hi Tony,
On 4/28/25 5:33 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> The RDT_RESOURCE_L3 resource carries a lot of state in the domain
> structures which needs to be dealt with when a domain is taken offline
> by removing the last CPU in the domain.
>
> Refactor so all the L3 processing is separated from general actions of
> clearing the CPU bit in the mask and removing directories from mon_data.
Why? Always please follow the tip guidance wrt changelogs: Context, Problem, Solution.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists