[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aByHDZyu0pptFUlK@stanley.mountain>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 13:27:25 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Mikhail Ulyanov <mikhail.ulyanov@...entembedded.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] media: rcar_jpu: remove redundant case statement
when c is zero
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The case statement where c is zero is redundant because the previous
> while loop will only exit if c is non-zero or non-0xff, so c can
> never be zero by the time the switch statement is reaced. Clean up
> the code by removing it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/renesas/rcar_jpu.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
612
613 for (;;) {
614 int c;
615
616 /* skip preceding filler bytes */
617 do
618 c = get_byte(&jpeg_buffer);
619 while (c == 0xff || c == 0);
Unrelated to your commit, but get_byte() returns -1 for out of
bounds. I wish there were a explicit check for that. We end
up hitting one of the "return 0;" statements depending on if
we've found a JPEG_MARKER_SOI.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists