[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <710bd9c4-efa4-444e-8699-5a6430e8d6be@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 16:50:05 +0530
From: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Xin Li <xin@...or.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.pan@...ux.microsoft.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] perf/x86: Enable NMI-source reporting for perfmon
On 5/7/2025 6:51 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Program the designated PMI NMI-source vector into the local vector table
> for the PMU. An NMI for the PMU would directly invoke the PMI handler
> without polling other NMI handlers, resulting in reduced PMI delivery
> latency.
>
> Co-developed-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> v5: No significant change.
> ---
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 6 +++---
> arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 031e908f0d61..42b270526631 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * This generic handler doesn't seem to have any issues where the
> * unmasking occurs so it was left at the top.
> */
> - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PERF_NMI);
>
> for_each_set_bit(idx, x86_pmu.cntr_mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
> if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask))
> @@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ void perf_events_lapic_init(void)
> /*
> * Always use NMI for PMU
> */
> - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PERF_NMI);
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 09d2d66c9f21..87c624686c58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3202,7 +3202,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * NMI handler.
> */
> if (!late_ack && !mid_ack)
> - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PERF_NMI);
> intel_bts_disable_local();
> cpuc->enabled = 0;
> __intel_pmu_disable_all(true);
> @@ -3239,7 +3239,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> done:
> if (mid_ack)
> - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PERF_NMI);
> /* Only restore PMU state when it's active. See x86_pmu_disable(). */
> cpuc->enabled = pmu_enabled;
> if (pmu_enabled)
> @@ -3252,7 +3252,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * Haswell CPUs.
> */
> if (late_ack)
> - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, PERF_NMI);
> return handled;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index 9bade39b5feb..b2f864e77d84 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #define BT_NMI (APIC_DM_NMI | NMIS_VECTOR_BT)
> #define KGDB_NMI (APIC_DM_NMI | NMIS_VECTOR_KGDB)
> #define MCE_NMI (APIC_DM_NMI | NMIS_VECTOR_MCE)
> +#define PERF_NMI (APIC_DM_NMI | NMIS_VECTOR_PMI)
>
> /*
> * Debugging macros
For AMD processors that do not support NMI source reporting but use
x86_pmu_handle_irq() and perf_events_lapic_init()
Tested-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists