lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025050855-lustrous-perch-ad8d@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 13:23:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/55] 5.15.182-rc1 review

On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 10:44:45AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 07/05/2025 19:39, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.182 release.
> > There are 55 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 09 May 2025 18:37:41 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.182-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> > 
> > -------------
> > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> 
> ...
> > Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
> >      serial: msm: Configure correct working mode before starting earlycon
> 
> The above commit is breaking the build for ARM64 and I am seeing
> the following build error ...
> 
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c: In function ‘msm_serial_early_console_setup_dm’:
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX’?
>  1737 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX, MSM_UART_CR);
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                  UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1737:60: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR’?
>  1737 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_RX, MSM_UART_CR);
>       |                                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                                            UART_CR
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1738:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX’?
>  1738 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX, MSM_UART_CR);
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                  UART_CR_CMD_RESET_TX
>   CC      drivers/ata/libata-transport.o
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c:1739:34: error: ‘MSM_UART_CR_TX_ENABLE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘UART_CR_TX_ENABLE’?
>  1739 |         msm_write(&device->port, MSM_UART_CR_TX_ENABLE, MSM_UART_CR);
>       |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                  UART_CR_TX_ENABLE
> 
> 
> After reverting this, the build is passing again.

Thanks, commit is now dropped.  Odd it didn't show up on my arm64
allmodconfig builds :(

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ