[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsKqxUExVW1rEhU8_5pYOuhkzXyeL9TmTyGVsV2-C-PFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 18:16:12 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com,
broonie@...nel.org, Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
## Build error riscv
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
| ^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
## Build riscv
* Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/log
* Build history:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/history/
* Build details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/details/
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/config
* Toolchain: gcc-13 and clang-20
## Steps to reproduce
- tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig allmodconfig
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.90-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: a7b3b5860e08c3b29b4a004562b9691d7c25a2f3
* git describe: v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test result summary
total: 112131, pass: 91642, fail: 4421, skip: 15654, xfail: 414
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 20 passed, 7 failed
* mips: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 20 total, 17 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 37 total, 33 passed, 4 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists