linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add binding for AM62L SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250508131454.z7ihjlcxdlglypew@bryanbrattlof.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 08:14:54 -0500
From: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero
 Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add binding for AM62L SoCs

On May  8, 2025 thus sayeth Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:09:19PM GMT, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > Add the binding for TI's AM62L family of devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v1:
> >  - separated out devicetree bindings
> > ---
> 
> <form letter>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
> 
> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
> on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
> will do that for tags received on the version they apply.
> 
> Please read:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> </form letter>

My apologies the last version I assumed the Un-Acked[0] comment was a 
request to remove any trailers I picked up from you. I can add them back 
to this patch if you wish

~Bryan

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/f189ec8e-88fc-491f-8552-e1e5d0b7cde7@kernel.org/