linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250508131225.xsc5exb6skkvmlpy@bryanbrattlof.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 08:12:25 -0500
From: Bryan Brattlof <bb@...com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra
	<vigneshr@...com>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
	<robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62l: add initial
 infrastructure

On May  8, 2025 thus sayeth Nishanth Menon:
> On 08:56-20250508, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 08/05/2025 08:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:09:20PM GMT, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> > >> +
> > >> +	uart6: serial@...0000 {
> > >> +		compatible = "ti,am64-uart", "ti,am654-uart";
> > >> +		reg = <0x00 0x02860000 0x00 0x100>;
> > >> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > >> +		power-domains = <&scmi_pds 82>;
> > >> +		clocks = <&scmi_clk 322>;
> > >> +		clock-names = "fclk";
> > >> +		status = "disabled";
> > >> +	};
> > >> +
> > >> +	conf: syscon@...0000 {
> > >> +		compatible = "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> > > 
> > > Not much improved here. You cannot have such compatibles alone and the
> > > bindings test this.
> > > 
> > > Are you sure you tested this?
> > I now tested it and I am 100% sure you did not.
> > 
> > Use tools and computers instead of humans for finding trivial issues.
> > This is not really acceptable.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> Bryan,
> In addition to bisect fails in this series, I see the following
> dtbs_check errors:
> 
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dtb: serial@0: clock-names:0: 'fclk' was expected
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dtb: spi@...0000: '#address-cells' is a dependency of '#size-cells'
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dtb: syscon@...00000: compatible: ['syscon', 'simple-mfd'] is too short
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62l3-evm.dtb: syscon@...0000: 'reg' is a required property
> 
> I suggest doing a revisit of this for the next window.
> 
> PS: https://github.com/nmenon/kernel_patch_verify is a tool I use and
> maintain which might help alleviate some of the easy checklist items -
> but this is probably not an authoritative tool and making sure, but if
> it helps you, please do use it - it is containerized for easy env setup
> (you could run kpv -V -C -L -3 for example on this series and get this:
> https://gist.github.com/nmenon/83f7e6924539d1c7e2eb6c5a4ee82706 )

Yeah I apologize everyone. I was working at little late and didn't 
notice my tooling to catch this stuff failed on me :/

I'll try again for the next window

Thanks for the reviews
~Bryan