linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: ch9200: avoid triggering NWay restart on non-zero PHY ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aB4dOy6fv1G1lFaf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 16:21:45 +0100
From: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	syzbot+3361c2d6f78a3e0892f9@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: ch9200: avoid triggering NWay restart on
 non-zero PHY ID

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> > Hi Andrew, Jakub
> > 
> > Just pinging on my last message. Any thoughts on how to proceed with
> > this patch series, I left my thoughts in the previous message.
> 
> I would suggest you do the minimum, low risk changes. Don't be driven
> to fix all the syzbot warnings just to make syzbot quiet. What really
> matters is you don't break the driver for users. syzbot is secondary.

Hi Andrew and Jakub,

Just pinging my previous message,
would you be happy with the minimal changes approach i suggested in my
previous message?

Thanks
Qasim
> 
> 	Andrew