[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCsAxtrVzcCaseR3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:58:42 +0100
From: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+3361c2d6f78a3e0892f9@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: ch9200: avoid triggering NWay restart on
non-zero PHY ID
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 04:22:59PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> > Hi Andrew, Jakub
> >
> > Just pinging on my last message. Any thoughts on how to proceed with
> > this patch series, I left my thoughts in the previous message.
>
> I would suggest you do the minimum, low risk changes. Don't be driven
> to fix all the syzbot warnings just to make syzbot quiet. What really
> matters is you don't break the driver for users. syzbot is secondary.
Hi Andrew
Just pinging on my last message, how should we move forward with this
patch series?
Thanks
Qasim
>
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists