[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b2c24e4-d515-481d-a00b-d50ae57304dd@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:02:19 +0530
From: Praveen Talari <quic_ptalari@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <psodagud@...cinc.com>, <djaggi@...cinc.com>, <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>,
<quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com>, <quic_arandive@...cinc.com>,
<quic_mnaresh@...cinc.com>, <quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com>,
Nikunj Kela
<quic_nkela@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] dt-bindings: serial: describe SA8255p
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank for you review and valuable inputs.
On 5/8/2025 11:15 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
>
> Thank you for your patience. I consider your inputs as valuable learning.
>
> On 5/6/2025 11:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/05/2025 20:02, Praveen Talari wrote:
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + enum:
>>> + - qcom,sa8255p-geni-uart
>>> + - qcom,sa8255p-geni-debug-uart
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + interrupts:
>>> + minItems: 1
>> Nothing changed here, this should be dropped based on previous
>> discussion.
>>
>> You sent this v5 on 8:02 PM of my time. *THEN* you responded to my
>> comment at v4 at 8:05 PM. That's the way to waste everyone's time.
>>
>> I do not understand why interrupt is optional for a new, complete device
>> description.
To put it simply, because we are using the RX GPIO line as wake up IRQ
and not all SE related pins are mapped in the PDC,
there is no specific wake-up pin to define. Therefore, the wake-up IRQ
should be considered optional.
Thanks,
Praveen
>
> On this platform, there is no use case of waking up UART, so we
> consider the wake up IRQ as optional.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Praveen
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists