[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250510053308.GB505731@sol>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 22:33:08 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Danny Tsen <dtsen@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] crypto: powerpc/poly1305 - Add poly1305_emit_arch
wrapper
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 01:10:22PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:44:50PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >
> > This fixes "-cpu Power10", but older CPUs (e.g. "-cpu POWER9") are still
> > failing.
>
> You're right. I'll revert this and apply the following patch
> instead.
>
> BTW this thing is still hopelessly broken if it's called from
> softirq context because there is no SIMD fallback. Yes I removed
> the SIMD check but it was already broken before that as it simply
> switched from the 4-block version to the 1-block version if SIMD
> is not available rather than actually doing something that is
> safe in softirq context.
>
> Perhaps we should just remove this altogether until it's fixed.
Yes, the PowerPC Poly1305 code incorrectly uses VSX without first checking
crypto_simd_usable(). And PowerPC also doesn't support VSX in softirqs, or at
least it doesn't claim to (it doesn't override may_use_simd(), so it gets the
default from include/asm-generic/simd.h which returns false in softirq context).
Maybe add 'depends on BROKEN' to CRYPTO_POLY1305_P10 for now, and give the
PowerPC folks (Cc'ed) a chance to fix this before removing the code.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists