[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250513153041.7bce37df@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:30:41 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra
<peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/its: Fix build errors when CONFIG_MODULES=n
On Wed, 14 May 2025 00:53:26 +0530
Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com> wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
>
> On 13/05/25 23:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2025 19:58:39 -0700
> > Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Fixes: 872df34d7c51 ("x86/its: Use dynamic thunks for indirect branches")
> >> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > No need to Cc stable. This isn't even in Linus's tree.
>
> It is now(today) present I think:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/872df34d7c51a79523820ea6a14860398c639b87
Bah. My upstream repo gets updated every night via a cronjob, and that's
what I was looking at.
>
> Greg queued this up for today's stable-rc which was released for Testing.
I didn't see any "stable" or "fixes" tag in the offending commit, so I
definitely didn't expect it to be in stable :-p
>
> Informed him about this fix:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/88d537d6-57be-4fbc-9722-15997a022abb@oracle.com/
Thanks for letting me know.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists