linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03197313-559f-4e62-915b-ac04a55c9794@t-8ch.de>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 07:33:35 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, 
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
	Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

On 2025-05-12 15:32:40-0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 5/10/25 00:54, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Hi Shuah and Kees,
> > 
> > On 2025-05-05 17:15:18+0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
> > > and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
> > > Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
> > > convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
> > > This series provides this compatibility by removing the usage of problematic
> > > libc features from the harness.
> > 
> > I'd like to get this series into the next merge window.
> > For that I'd like to expose it to linux-next through the nolibc tree.
> > If you don't have the time for a review or issues crop up, I will drop
> > the patches again.
> > 
> > Are you fine with that?
> 
> Didn't I respond to v13 saying you can include in your nolibc PR?
> If I didn't here is my Reviewed-by.

You did ack v3. But as some patches changed, I wanted to reconfirm the
new contents.

> > 
> > The issues reported by Mark have been fixed and tests have been written
> > for them.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

Thanks!
As most patches already carry your Ack, I transformed this Reviewed-by
into an Acked-by for the two new patches for consistency.


Thomas