[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250514160528.GM2701446@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 09:05:28 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@....com>
Cc: "linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, hch <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: add inode to zone caching for data placement
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:50:37AM +0000, Hans Holmberg wrote:
> Placing data from the same file in the same zone is a great heuristic
> for reducing write amplification and we do this already - but only
> for sequential writes.
>
> To support placing data in the same way for random writes, reuse the
> xfs mru cache to map inodes to open zones on first write. If a mapping
> is present, use the open zone for data placement for this file until
> the zone is full.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@....com>
Odd, did my rvb from last time get dropped? This doesn't look like a
huge change to me...
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index e5192c12e7ac..f90c0a16766f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
> bool m_update_sb; /* sb needs update in mount */
> unsigned int m_max_open_zones;
> unsigned int m_zonegc_low_space;
> + struct xfs_mru_cache *m_zone_cache; /* Inode to open zone cache */
>
> /*
> * Bitsets of per-fs metadata that have been checked and/or are sick.
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> index d509e49b2aaa..80add26c0111 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include "xfs_zone_priv.h"
> #include "xfs_zones.h"
> #include "xfs_trace.h"
> +#include "xfs_mru_cache.h"
>
> void
> xfs_open_zone_put(
> @@ -796,6 +797,100 @@ xfs_submit_zoned_bio(
> submit_bio(&ioend->io_bio);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Cache the last zone written to for an inode so that it is considered first
> + * for subsequent writes.
> + */
> +struct xfs_zone_cache_item {
> + struct xfs_mru_cache_elem mru;
> + struct xfs_open_zone *oz;
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct xfs_zone_cache_item *
> +xfs_zone_cache_item(struct xfs_mru_cache_elem *mru)
> +{
> + return container_of(mru, struct xfs_zone_cache_item, mru);
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +xfs_zone_cache_free_func(
> + void *data,
> + struct xfs_mru_cache_elem *mru)
> +{
> + struct xfs_zone_cache_item *item = xfs_zone_cache_item(mru);
> +
> + xfs_open_zone_put(item->oz);
> + kfree(item);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if we have a cached last open zone available for the inode and
> + * if yes return a reference to it.
> + */
> +static struct xfs_open_zone *
> +xfs_cached_zone(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + struct xfs_inode *ip)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mru_cache_elem *mru;
> + struct xfs_open_zone *oz;
> +
> + mru = xfs_mru_cache_lookup(mp->m_zone_cache, ip->i_ino);
> + if (!mru)
> + return NULL;
> + oz = xfs_zone_cache_item(mru)->oz;
> + if (oz) {
> + /*
> + * GC only steals open zones at mount time, so no GC zones
> + * should end up in the cache.
> + */
> + ASSERT(!oz->oz_is_gc);
> + ASSERT(atomic_read(&oz->oz_ref) > 0);
> + atomic_inc(&oz->oz_ref);
> + }
> + xfs_mru_cache_done(mp->m_zone_cache);
> + return oz;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Update the last used zone cache for a given inode.
> + *
> + * The caller must have a reference on the open zone.
> + */
> +static void
> +xfs_zone_cache_create_association(
> + struct xfs_inode *ip,
> + struct xfs_open_zone *oz)
> +{
> + struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> + struct xfs_zone_cache_item *item = NULL;
> + struct xfs_mru_cache_elem *mru;
> +
> + ASSERT(atomic_read(&oz->oz_ref) > 0);
> + atomic_inc(&oz->oz_ref);
> +
> + mru = xfs_mru_cache_lookup(mp->m_zone_cache, ip->i_ino);
> + if (mru) {
> + /*
> + * If we have an association already, update it to point to the
> + * new zone.
> + */
> + item = xfs_zone_cache_item(mru);
> + xfs_open_zone_put(item->oz);
> + item->oz = oz;
> + xfs_mru_cache_done(mp->m_zone_cache);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + item = kmalloc(sizeof(*item), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!item) {
> + xfs_open_zone_put(oz);
> + return;
> + }
> + item->oz = oz;
> + xfs_mru_cache_insert(mp->m_zone_cache, ip->i_ino, &item->mru);
> +}
> +
> void
> xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit(
> struct iomap_ioend *ioend,
> @@ -819,11 +914,16 @@ xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit(
> */
> if (!*oz && ioend->io_offset)
> *oz = xfs_last_used_zone(ioend);
> + if (!*oz)
> + *oz = xfs_cached_zone(mp, ip);
> +
> if (!*oz) {
> select_zone:
> *oz = xfs_select_zone(mp, write_hint, pack_tight);
> if (!*oz)
> goto out_error;
> +
> + xfs_zone_cache_create_association(ip, *oz);
> }
>
> alloc_len = xfs_zone_alloc_blocks(*oz, XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, ioend->io_size),
> @@ -1211,6 +1311,14 @@ xfs_mount_zones(
> error = xfs_zone_gc_mount(mp);
> if (error)
> goto out_free_zone_info;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set up a mru cache to track inode to open zone for data placement
> + * purposes. The magic values for group count and life time is the
> + * same as the defaults for file streams, which seems sane enough.
> + */
> + xfs_mru_cache_create(&mp->m_zone_cache, mp,
> + 5000, 10, xfs_zone_cache_free_func);
> return 0;
>
> out_free_zone_info:
> @@ -1224,4 +1332,5 @@ xfs_unmount_zones(
> {
> xfs_zone_gc_unmount(mp);
> xfs_free_zone_info(mp->m_zone_info);
> + xfs_mru_cache_destroy(mp->m_zone_cache);
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists