| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <aCS/SxDG9M+jh7Wr@lpieralisi>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 18:05:31 +0200
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@....com>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@....com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/26] arm64: smp: Support non-SGIs for IPIs
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:39:28PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:48:11PM +0200, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > /*
> > * Called from the secondary holding pen, this is the secondary CPU entry point.
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > index 3b3f6b56e733039cad7ff5b8995db16a68f3c762..3f3712e47c94c62836fb89cd4bfb3595fbb41557 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -83,7 +83,26 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
> >
> > static int ipi_irq_base __ro_after_init;
> > static int nr_ipi __ro_after_init = NR_IPI;
> > -static struct irq_desc *ipi_desc[MAX_IPI] __ro_after_init;
> > +
> > +struct ipi_descs {
> > + struct irq_desc *descs[MAX_IPI];
> > +};
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_descs, pcpu_ipi_desc);
> > +
> > +#define get_ipi_desc(__cpu, __ipi) (per_cpu_ptr(&pcpu_ipi_desc, __cpu)->descs[__ipi])
> > +
> > +static bool percpu_ipi_descs __ro_after_init;
> > +
> > +static int ipi_to_irq(int ipi, int cpu)
> > +{
> > + return ipi_irq_base + (cpu * nr_ipi) + ipi;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int irq_to_ipi(int irq)
> > +{
> > + return (irq - ipi_irq_base) % nr_ipi;
> > +}
> >
> > static bool crash_stop;
> >
> > @@ -844,7 +863,7 @@ int arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec)
> > seq_printf(p, "%*s%u:%s", prec - 1, "IPI", i,
> > prec >= 4 ? " " : "");
> > for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > - seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_desc_kstat_cpu(ipi_desc[i], cpu));
> > + seq_printf(p, "%10u ", irq_desc_kstat_cpu(get_ipi_desc(cpu, i), cpu));
> > seq_printf(p, " %s\n", ipi_types[i]);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -919,7 +938,13 @@ static void __noreturn ipi_cpu_crash_stop(unsigned int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs
> >
> > static void arm64_backtrace_ipi(cpumask_t *mask)
> > {
> > - __ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE], mask);
> > + unsigned int cpu;
> > +
> > + if (!percpu_ipi_descs)
> > + __ipi_send_mask(get_ipi_desc(0, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE), mask);
> > + else
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
> > + __ipi_send_single(get_ipi_desc(cpu, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE), cpu);
> > }
> >
> > void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, int exclude_cpu)
> > @@ -944,7 +969,7 @@ void kgdb_roundup_cpus(void)
> > if (cpu == this_cpu)
> > continue;
> >
> > - __ipi_send_single(ipi_desc[IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP], cpu);
> > + __ipi_send_single(get_ipi_desc(cpu, IPI_KGDB_ROUNDUP), cpu);
> > }
> > }
> > #endif
> > @@ -1013,14 +1038,21 @@ static void do_handle_IPI(int ipinr)
> >
> > static irqreturn_t ipi_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > {
> > - do_handle_IPI(irq - ipi_irq_base);
> > + do_handle_IPI(irq_to_ipi(irq));
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
> > {
> > + unsigned int cpu;
> > +
> > trace_ipi_raise(target, ipi_types[ipinr]);
> > - __ipi_send_mask(ipi_desc[ipinr], target);
> > +
> > + if (!percpu_ipi_descs)
> > + __ipi_send_mask(get_ipi_desc(0, ipinr), target);
> > + else
> > + for_each_cpu(cpu, target)
> > + __ipi_send_single(get_ipi_desc(cpu, ipinr), cpu);
> > }
> >
> > static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
> > @@ -1046,11 +1078,15 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu)
> > return;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) {
> > - if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
> > - prepare_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > - enable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> > + if (!percpu_ipi_descs) {
> > + if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
> > + prepare_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + enable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> > + } else {
> > + enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> > + }
> > } else {
> > - enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> > + enable_irq(irq_desc_get_irq(get_ipi_desc(cpu, i)));
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > @@ -1064,44 +1100,79 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu)
> > return;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++) {
> > - if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
> > - disable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > - teardown_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + if (!percpu_ipi_descs) {
> > + if (ipi_should_be_nmi(i)) {
> > + disable_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + teardown_percpu_nmi(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + } else {
> > + disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + }
> > } else {
> > - disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
> > + disable_irq(irq_desc_get_irq(get_ipi_desc(cpu, i)));
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > -void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)
> > +static void ipi_setup_ppi(int ipi)
> > +{
> > + int err, irq, cpu;
> > +
> > + irq = ipi_irq_base + ipi;
> > +
> > + if (ipi_should_be_nmi(irq)) {
> > + err = request_percpu_nmi(irq, ipi_handler, "IPI", &irq_stat);
> > + WARN(err, "Could not request IRQ %d as NMI, err=%d\n", irq, err);
> > + } else {
> > + err = request_percpu_irq(irq, ipi_handler, "IPI", &irq_stat);
> > + WARN(err, "Could not request IRQ %d as IRQ, err=%d\n", irq, err);
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> > + get_ipi_desc(cpu, ipi) = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > +
> > + irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_HIDDEN);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_setup_lpi(int ipi, int ncpus)
> > +{
> > + for (int cpu = 0; cpu < ncpus; cpu++) {
> > + int err, irq;
> > +
> > + irq = ipi_to_irq(ipi, cpu);
> > +
> > + err = irq_force_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
> > +
> > + WARN(err, "Could not force affinity IRQ %d, err=%d\n", irq, err);
> > +
> > + err = request_irq(irq, ipi_handler, IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, "IPI",
> > + &irq_stat);
>
> Heads-up, kbuild bot (sparse) barfed (correctly) at this, because the
> &irq_stat pointer does not match the request_irq() void *dev_id parameter
> signature (it is void __percpu *).
>
> Of course, the &irq_stat parameter is unused so this is harmless.
>
> I would just pass NULL (because AFAICS irq_stat in the action handler is
> unused), the question is why are we passing &irq_stat in
> request_percpu_irq() if that's unused in ipi_handler() ?
Right, we have to have it there even if the ipi_handler() does not use
it, that's as much as I can gather by checking the request_percpu_irq()
interface and the percpu flow handler (handle_percpu_devid_irq()) used
for SGIs IRQs on GICv3.
For non-SGI IPIs, I will just pass NULL to request_irq() as void *dev_id
because AFAICS it is not used in arm64 ipi_handler() (I use the
handle_percpu_irq() flow handler), I applied the fix-up locally FYI.
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists