[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCQrMh+wxDzrpAKA@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:33:38 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, <kai.huang@...el.com>, <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 05/12] KVM: TDX: Add tdx_pamt_get()/put() helpers
>+static void tdx_pamt_put(struct page *page)
>+{
>+ unsigned long hpa = page_to_phys(page);
>+ atomic_t *pamt_refcount;
>+ LIST_HEAD(pamt_pages);
>+ u64 err;
>+
>+ if (!tdx_supports_dynamic_pamt(tdx_sysinfo))
>+ return;
>+
>+ hpa = ALIGN_DOWN(hpa, SZ_2M);
>+
>+ pamt_refcount = tdx_get_pamt_refcount(hpa);
>+ if (!atomic_dec_and_test(pamt_refcount))
>+ return;
>+
>+ spin_lock(&pamt_lock);
>+
>+ /* Lost race against tdx_pamt_add()? */
>+ if (atomic_read(pamt_refcount) != 0) {
>+ spin_unlock(&pamt_lock);
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ err = tdh_phymem_pamt_remove(hpa | TDX_PS_2M, &pamt_pages);
>+ spin_unlock(&pamt_lock);
>+
>+ if (err) {
>+ pr_tdx_error(TDH_PHYMEM_PAMT_REMOVE, err);
Should the refcount be increased here, since the PAMT pages are not removed?
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ tdx_free_pamt_pages(&pamt_pages);
>+}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists