[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DS7PR19MB888370ACC69E0A1ABC46D3BB9D91A@DS7PR19MB8883.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 12:04:45 +0400
From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: qcom: ipq5018: keep XO clock always on
On 5/10/25 01:47, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5/6/25 7:43 AM, George Moussalem via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
>>
>> The XO clock must not be disabled to avoid the kernel trying to disable
>> the it (when parenting it under the CMN PLL reference clock), else the
>> kernel will panic and the below message will appear in the kernel logs.
>> So let's enable the XO and its source CLK and keep them always on.
>>
>> [ 0.916515] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 0.918890] gcc_xo_clk_src status stuck at 'on'
>> [ 0.918944] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 8 at drivers/clk/qcom/clk-branch.c:86 clk_branch_wait+0x114/0x124
>> [ 0.927926] Modules linked in:
>> [ 0.936945] CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 6.6.74 #0
>> [ 0.939982] Hardware name: Linksys MX2000 (DT)
>> [ 0.946151] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
>> [ 0.950489] pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>> [ 0.954566] pc : clk_branch_wait+0x114/0x124
>> [ 0.961335] lr : clk_branch_wait+0x114/0x124
>> [ 0.965849] sp : ffffffc08181bb50
>> [ 0.970101] x29: ffffffc08181bb50 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 61c8864680b583eb
>> [ 0.973317] x26: ffffff801fec2168 x25: ffffff800000abc0 x24: 0000000000000002
>> [ 0.980437] x23: ffffffc0809f6fd8 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffffc08044193c
>> [ 0.985276] loop: module loaded
>> [ 0.987554] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffffc081749278 x18: 000000000000007c
>> [ 0.987573] x17: 0000000091706274 x16: 000000001985c4f7 x15: ffffffc0816bbdf0
>> [ 0.987587] x14: 0000000000000174 x13: 000000000000007c x12: 00000000ffffffea
>> [ 0.987601] x11: 00000000ffffefff x10: ffffffc081713df0 x9 : ffffffc0816bbd98
>> [ 0.987615] x8 : 0000000000017fe8 x7 : c0000000ffffefff x6 : 0000000000057fa8
>> [ 1.026268] x5 : 0000000000000fff x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffffffc08181b950
>> [ 1.033385] x2 : ffffffc0816bbd30 x1 : ffffffc0816bbd30 x0 : 0000000000000023
>> [ 1.040507] Call trace:
>> [ 1.047618] clk_branch_wait+0x114/0x124
>> [ 1.049875] clk_branch2_disable+0x2c/0x3c
>> [ 1.054043] clk_core_disable+0x60/0xac
>> [ 1.057948] clk_core_disable+0x68/0xac
>> [ 1.061681] clk_disable+0x30/0x4c
>> [ 1.065499] pm_clk_suspend+0xd4/0xfc
>> [ 1.068971] pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x2c/0x44
>> [ 1.072705] __rpm_callback+0x40/0x1bc
>> [ 1.077392] rpm_callback+0x6c/0x78
>> [ 1.081038] rpm_suspend+0xf0/0x5c0
>> [ 1.084423] pm_runtime_work+0xf0/0xfc
>> [ 1.087895] process_one_work+0x17c/0x2f8
>> [ 1.091716] worker_thread+0x2e8/0x4d4
>> [ 1.095795] kthread+0xdc/0xe0
>> [ 1.099440] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>> [ 1.102480] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + /* Keep some clocks always-on */
>> + qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x30018); /* GCC_XO_CLK_SRC */
>
> this clock is not a clk_branch2 - its control register is different and
> this call is incorrect - you can drop it altogether, as if the XO source
> clock isn't running, the system is dead
>
>> + qcom_branch_set_clk_en(regmap, 0x30030); /* GCC_XO_CLK */
>
> This one actually is likely supposed to be always-on too - does removing
> these two lines do any harm?
removing these lines AND the clock structs works AND updating the
parents for clocks that reference the xo_clk_src works. There kernel is
not complaining about anything. The other option is setting the
CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag. What would your preference be?
>
> Konrad
Thanks,
George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists