[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f1140397e628cfdf4156f02f5454f844003dc6d.camel@mailbox.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 15:37:06 +0200
From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@...lbox.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Philipp Stanner
<phasta@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, Yang Yingliang
<yangyingliang@...wei.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] PCI: Remove unnecessary prototype from pci.h
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 16:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > pcim_intx() once was an internal PCI function, but since then has
> > been
> > published and is used by drivers, and, therefore, available in
> > include/linux/pci.h. The function is not used within PCI anymore.
> >
> > Remove pcim_intx()'s prototype from drivers/pci/pci.h
>
> Can this be moved up in the series? Or is there other dependencies?
> I.o.w. this
> looks like a leftover from something of the previous work.
>
That can be moved to anywhere, including a separate patch. It's an
independent patch, a leftover from last year. But it's related to
devres, because it was also added because of the problem with
pcim_enable_device().
P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists