[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94e0951b-46e1-439b-9dbc-c2009a78b04b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 17:54:20 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: long.yunjian@....com.cn, hjc@...k-chips.com
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, andy.yan@...k-chips.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fang.yumeng@....com.cn, mou.yi@....com.cn,
xu.lifeng1@....com.cn, ouyang.maochun@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: Use dev_err_probe() to simplify code
On 15/05/2025 14:35, long.yunjian@....com.cn wrote:
> From: Yumeng Fang <fang.yumeng@....com.cn>
>
> In the probe path, dev_err() can be replaced with dev_err_probe()
That's not probe path. I am not sure if you really understand this code.
> which will check if error code is -EPROBE_DEFER and prints the
> error name. It also sets the defer probe reason which can be
> checked later through debugfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yumeng Fang <fang.yumeng@....com.cn>
Incomplete chain.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists