linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device types + BCM59054 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8beeddcf-1dc7-4af8-b287-4c896852b258@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:28:15 +0200
From: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui
 <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
 Broadcom internal kernel review list
 <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
 Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device
 types + BCM59054 compatible

On 5/15/25 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2025, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> Well, you choose 3 - I do think it'd be a lot easier to go with option
>>> 2, or with applying the rest to your tree as acks come in.  There seemed
>>> to still be a reasonable amount of discussion on the MFD bits (eg,
>>> there's some formatting comments still) so I was expecting this series
>>> to churn some more and was waiting for a resend.
> 
>> Yes, I expected to apply v9 with your Ack.
> 
> OK, that's about where I was expecting - at least one more respin before
> the MFD bits are stable.
> 
>> I can go with 2 in this case.  Applying in dribs-and-drabs as Acks come
>> in would be sub-optimal and would likely end up in a mess.
> 
> Well, then just going a head and applying them on a branch with a tag
> seems easier than delaying then.

I can split the patchset into two parts (one for MFD, one for regulator)
if it helps.

Best regards
Artur