[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCXQUu97HL_yrH89@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:30:26 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: bcm590xx: Add support for multiple device
types + BCM59054 compatible
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Artur Weber wrote:
> On 5/15/25 11:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:20:00AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > I can go with 2 in this case. Applying in dribs-and-drabs as Acks come
> > > in would be sub-optimal and would likely end up in a mess.
> > Well, then just going a head and applying them on a branch with a tag
> > seems easier than delaying then.
> I can split the patchset into two parts (one for MFD, one for regulator)
> if it helps.
There's still a dependency on the MFD bits whatever happens.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists