[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b09f8b7-579b-441b-8c0e-2dbab7ac1740@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 23:45:23 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wen.yang@...ux.dev>
To: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: headers_install: fix a false positive
On 5/15/25 19:32, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:00:56AM +0800, Wen Yang wrote:
>> The current implementation only handles C89 style comments (/*... */) in
>> the code, and there are false positives for C99 style comments (//...).
>>
>> This patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang@...ux.dev>
>> ---
>> scripts/headers_install.sh | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/headers_install.sh b/scripts/headers_install.sh
>> index 6bbccb43f7e7..41722bcc8668 100755
>> --- a/scripts/headers_install.sh
>> +++ b/scripts/headers_install.sh
>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ scripts/unifdef -U__KERNEL__ -D__EXPORTED_HEADERS__ $TMPFILE > $OUTFILE
>> # Remove /* ... */ style comments, and find CONFIG_ references in code
>> configs=$(sed -e '
>> :comment
>> + s://.*::
>> s:/\*[^*][^*]*:/*:
>> s:/\*\*\**\([^/]\):/*\1:
>> t comment
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
> thanks. The patch looks good to me, but I cannot find any false
> positives. Have you found any concrete?
>
Thanks. We have enhanced dmabuf on our SoC platform and modified the
include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h file, and then found this issue.
--
Best wishes,
Wen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists