linux-kernel - [PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250516164648.15396-1-solemnsquire@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 22:16:43 +0530
From: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@...il.com>
To: skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word

Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in
filesystems directory.

Signed-off-by: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
 
 Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
 be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
-transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
+transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
 basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
 
 Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation
-- 
2.49.0