[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2973cc3d-a4e2-4120-ae89-730581090ef8@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 16:20:38 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: removed repeated word
On 5/16/25 10:46, Nidhish Chauhan wrote:
> Removed a repeated word 'at' from journalling.rst at line no. 96 in
> filesystems directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nidhish Chauhan <solemnsquire@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> index 863e93e623f7..2825f6c030c2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/journalling.rst
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ easily as on jbd2_journal_start().
>
> Try to reserve the right number of blocks the first time. ;-). This will
> be the maximum number of blocks you are going to touch in this
> -transaction. I advise having a look at at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
> +transaction. I advise having a look at least ext4_jbd.h to see the
> basis on which ext4 uses to make these decisions.
>
> Another wriggle to watch out for is your on-disk block allocation
Please run get_maintainers.pl to get the correct list of recipients for
this patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists