linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Add #pwm-cells property to the two SoC PWMs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ss6jqmpz55wz3sb27kg7mu555qowf5enu3fe32zlxgqeix7odi@zhs3ns4euljf>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 11:53:48 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>, 
	Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Add #pwm-cells property to the two
 SoC PWMs

Hello,

[adding Arnd to To:]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:05:29PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > If these PWMs are to be used, a #pwm-cells property is necessary. The
> > right location for that is in the SoC's dtsi file to not make
> > machine.dts files repeat the value for each usage. Currently the
> > machines based on nxp/lpc/lpc32xx.dtsi don't make use of the PWMs, so
> > there are no properties to drop there.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
> 
> I wonder if this patch is still on someone's radar. I didn't hear
> anything back and it's not in next.

This is still the status quo. 

There is a patch in next touching arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/lpc/lpc32xx.dtsi
applied by Arnd. So maybe the problem that my patch wasn't picked up is
that Arnd wasn't aware?

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)