linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Add #pwm-cells property to the two SoC PWMs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97db26c1-6d03-48ce-a1d3-cb5c7c604cf2@mleia.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 17:02:54 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Piotr Wojtaszczyk <piotr.wojtaszczyk@...esys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: lpc32xx: Add #pwm-cells property to the two SoC
 PWMs

Hi Uwe,

On 5/16/25 12:53, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> [adding Arnd to To:]
> 
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:05:29PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:49:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> If these PWMs are to be used, a #pwm-cells property is necessary. The
>>> right location for that is in the SoC's dtsi file to not make
>>> machine.dts files repeat the value for each usage. Currently the
>>> machines based on nxp/lpc/lpc32xx.dtsi don't make use of the PWMs, so
>>> there are no properties to drop there.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
>>
>> I wonder if this patch is still on someone's radar. I didn't hear
>> anything back and it's not in next.
> 
> This is still the status quo.
> 
> There is a patch in next touching arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/lpc/lpc32xx.dtsi
> applied by Arnd. So maybe the problem that my patch wasn't picked up is
> that Arnd wasn't aware?

I've just started the process of getting my kernel.org account this
week to be able to send ARM LPC32xx/LPC18xx pull requests.

Right at the moment it's better to rely on Arnd's and other ARM
maintainers to include the correspondent patches, and for what it's
worth let me give my tags to your change.

Sorry for such the inconvenince and delay, I believe it'll be better,
and thank you very much for the change.

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir