[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36f02ed8-b440-4760-8d08-b633406ce92a@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 11:15:49 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Wenmeng Liu <quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for camss
On 16/05/2025 08:34, Wenmeng Liu wrote:
>> This should be 689 yes
>>
>> ---
>> bod
>
> Hi Bryan,Konrad,
>
> I confirmed that the value is 688 instead of 689. The documentation
> incorrectly listed it as 689. To CC linux-media, I have resent the patch:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20250516072707.388332-1-
> quic_wenmliu@...cinc.com/
Do you mean the documentation in the kernel or the documentation inside
of qcom ?
I checked the internal silicon definition, I think Konrad did also.
Which documentation do you mean here ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists