[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCcnWx_BzfuLxZ9P@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 13:54:03 +0200
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 11/19] clk: imx: add support for i.MX8MM anatop clock
driver
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:52:51AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 08:21:41AM +0200, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> > Support NXP i.MX8M anatop PLL module which generates PLLs to CCM root.
> > By doing so, we also simplify the CCM driver code. The changes are
> > backward compatible.
>
> This patch, which has been in -next for the past few days as
> 3cbc38cf42ca42d2, breaks boot on i.MX8MP platforms (I have the EVK and
> Verdin). We die with:
This boot break is still present in -next, and I've not seen a fix
posted yet. Should we just revert the relevant patches until a fix is
available?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists