linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: mediatek: Add #reset-cells property for MT8188

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dcc085b131ec0b8769630bee6ee89ca0b6eacc73.camel@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 16:14:54 +0200
From: Julien Massot <julien.massot@...labora.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,  Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Garmin Chang	
 <garmin.chang@...iatek.com>, Friday Yang <friday.yang@...iatek.com>, Conor
 Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: mediatek: Add #reset-cells
 property for MT8188


Hi Conor, Angelo,
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:17 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 05:11:13PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 15/05/25 17:03, Conor Dooley ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 03:31:43PM +0200, Julien Massot wrote:
> > > > The '#reset-cells' property is required for some of the MT8188
> > > > clock controllers, but not listed as a valid property.
> > > 
> > > "required for some" but not marked required on those platforms.
> > > Why not?
> > > 
> > 
> > Yeah now that I read that for the third time, the wording is a bit incorrect.
> > 
> > It's not "required", some clock controllers do have reset controllers, but it
> > is facultative to actually use the latter.
> 
> I don't think I've ever seen this word before.
> 
> > I'm not sure if the ones that do have reset controllers inside should have the
> > #reset-cells property as required...
> > 
> > Conor, what do you think?
> 
> If "required for some" in the OP was meant as "permitted for some",
> change the wording to that and it is fine.
Changed 'required' by 'permitted' in v2.

Thanks,
Julien