[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250516141816.GB530183@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 11:18:16 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: lizhe.67@...edance.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/type1: optimize vfio_pin_pages_remote() for
hugetlbfs folio
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 03:19:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2025 11:57:30 +0800
> lizhe.67@...edance.com wrote:
>
> > From: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
> >
> > When vfio_pin_pages_remote() is called with a range of addresses that
> > includes hugetlbfs folios, the function currently performs individual
> > statistics counting operations for each page. This can lead to significant
> > performance overheads, especially when dealing with large ranges of pages.
> >
> > This patch optimize this process by batching the statistics counting
> > operations.
> >
> > The performance test results for completing the 8G VFIO IOMMU DMA mapping,
> > obtained through trace-cmd, are as follows. In this case, the 8G virtual
> > address space has been mapped to physical memory using hugetlbfs with
> > pagesize=2M.
> >
> > Before this patch:
> > funcgraph_entry: # 33813.703 us | vfio_pin_map_dma();
> >
> > After this patch:
> > funcgraph_entry: # 15635.055 us | vfio_pin_map_dma();
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for looking at improvements in this area...
Why not just use iommufd? Doesn't it already does all these
optimizations?
Indeed today you can use iommufd with a memfd handle which should
return the huge folios directly from the hugetlbfs and we never
iterate with 4K pages.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists