[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <432a58c0-8b1c-4585-b299-f35286ee4b62@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 07:18:25 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "ping.gao" <ping.gao@...sung.com>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com, minwoo.im@...sung.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, chenyuan0y@...il.com,
cw9316.lee@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mcq: delete ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd in
ufshcd_mcq_abort
On 5/16/25 1:38 AM, ping.gao wrote:
> after ufs UFS_ABORT_TASK process successfully , host will generate
> mcq irq for abort tag with response OCS_ABORTED
> ufshcd_compl_one_cqe ->
> ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd
>
> But in ufshcd_mcq_abort already do ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd, this means
> __ufshcd_release will be done twice.
>
> This means hba->clk_gating.active_reqs also will be decrease twice, it
> will be negtive, so delete ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd in ufshcd_mcq_abort
> function.
>
> static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> if (!ufshcd_is_clkgating_allowed(hba))
> return;
>
> hba->clk_gating.active_reqs--;
>
> if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs < 0) {
> panic("ufs abnormal active_reqs!!!!!!");
> }
>
> ...
> }
> Signed-off-by: ping.gao <ping.gao@...sung.com>
A blank line is required between a patch description and a Signed-off-by
tag. Additionally, please add a Fixes: tag to the patch description.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists