linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V11 00/15] Rust abstractions for clk, cpumask, cpufreq, OPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250519051217.clxqculya7zxl7rp@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:42:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@...il.com>, a.hindborg@...nel.org,
	alex.bennee@...aro.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
	anisse@...ier.eu, benno.lossin@...ton.me, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
	boqun.feng@...il.com, bqe@...gle.com, dakr@...nel.org,
	dakr@...hat.com, daniel.almeida@...labora.com, gary@...yguo.net,
	joakim.bech@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...linux.org.uk, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
	manos.pitsidianakis@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com, nm@...com,
	ojeda@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org,
	robh@...nel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, tmgross@...ch.edu, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	vireshk@...nel.org, yury.norov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 00/15] Rust abstractions for clk, cpumask, cpufreq,
 OPP

On 08-05-25, 10:52, Philip Li wrote:
> Sorry Viresh, there's coverage gap at the bot side. One is rust kconfig
> is not set as mandatory early on. Also the bot met build test slowness
> these days and is under recovering gradually. Thus I think the issue
> is not detected in time.
> 
> We will resolve both issues asap to provide better test coverage.

Thanks Philip, I can see the reports (with failures) now.

-- 
viresh