[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250519-barnacle-of-beautiful-enthusiasm-4e6af0@kuoka>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:18:55 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>, Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Update sc8280xp camcc
bindings
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:38:47AM GMT, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> SC8280XP camcc only requires the MMCX power domain, unlike
> SM8450 camcc which will now support both MMCX and MXC power
I do not see change to sm8450 here. This makes no sense on its own. You
do not move compatibles - what is the point of such change?
> domains. Hence move SC8280XP camcc bindings from SM8450 to
> SA8775P camcc.
Subject: everything could be an update. Be specific.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18
>
> SA8775P camcc doesn't support required-opps property currently
> but SC8280XP camcc need that property, so add required-opps
> based on SC8280XP camcc conditional check in SA8775P camcc
> bindings.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists