[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCssur0WxPbFs2HQ@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 15:06:02 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: alejandroe1@...tab.com, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] riscv: dts: sophgo: add zfh for sg2042
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 04:49:01PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 01:55:54PM +0200, Alejandro Enrique via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Alejandro Enrique <alejandroe1@...tab.com>
> >
> > Add compatible for u-blox NEO-9M GPS module.
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox,neo-6m.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gnss/u-blox,neo-6m.yaml
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
> > - u-blox,neo-6m
> > - u-blox,neo-8
> > - u-blox,neo-m8
> > + - u-blox,neo-m9
>
> No match data in the driver, why is a fallback not sufficient?
By the way, what happened with the Subject in your reply here, Conor?
Johan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists