[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250520111301.1346035-1-arefev@swemel.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 14:12:59 +0300
From: Denis Arefev <arefev@...mel.ru>
To: noname.nuno@...il.com
Cc: arefev@...mel.ru,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org,
michael.hennerich@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Input: adp5588-keys Please correct and add
> On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 16:43 +0300, Denis Arefev wrote:
>> 1. Add check on return code
>> 2. Prevent buffer overflow
>>
>> Denis Arefev (2):
>> Input: adp5588-keys Add check on return code
>> Input: adp5588-keys Prevent buffer overflow
>>
>> drivers/input/keyboard/adp5588-keys.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch. However, not sure if this is really worth it... This is
> driver is in the process of being removed:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/04b8a6d68fdc0c0eadf69fbbc6a130ecc6c49360.camel@gmail.com/T/#mad1980e9652161a6a2e36c2aeeb97f900c6e9fc2
>
> Unless we want somehow to backport these patches?
>
> - Nuno Sá
Hi Nuno.
It'd be great if the fix patches are applied and then directed
to stable kernels before the code is dropped from upstream.
I've sent v3 with relevant stable tags included. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists