lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6d066ea-e47d-4495-bd0b-17ba184275a1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 15:58:32 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>,
 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: input: add Semtech SX951x binding

On 06/05/2025 12:05, David Bauer wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> thanks for the review.
> 
> On 5/6/25 08:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/05/2025 22:38, David Bauer wrote:
>>> Add device-tree binding for the Semtech SX9512/SX9513 family of touch
>>> controllers with integrated LED driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
>>
>> You CC-ed an address, which suggests you do not work on mainline kernel
>> or you do not use get_maintainers.pl/b4/patman. Please rebase and always
>> work on mainline or start using mentioned tools, so correct addresses
>> will be used.
> I'm a bit unsure what you are referring to - maybe I've set the options
> for get_maintainer.pl wrong, but i use
> 
> get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
> 
> to determine TO recipients and
> 
> get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nom
> 
> for CC destinations.
> 
> Granted, my tree was a bit out of date but it was from mainline

Mainline means latest RC or maintainer tree or linux next. v5.0 is not
mainline anymoer.

> and after rebase both commands returned consistent results.
> 
> Hope you can provide me with some guidance there.

Well, read full reply. It is impossible to get such email address from
above commands. Such email address does not exist since long time and it
easy to prove - just git grep for it. No results, so how could it be
printed by get_maintainers.pl?

If you disagree then please paste full output of:

$ git describe
$ git status
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl 0*

I provided you extensive guideline exactly to avoid further trivial
discussions about that triviality, so I would really appreciate if you
followed it.

> 
>>
>> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
>> and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument, so you will
>> not CC people just because they made one commit years ago). It might
>> happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated
>> entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux
>> kernel.
>>
>> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
>> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
>> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
>> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
>> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
>> patches to the patchset.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml        | 180 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 180 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..e4f938decd86
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/semtech,sx951x.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Semtech SX9512/SX9513 based capacitive touch sensors
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>
>> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
>>
>>> +  The Semtech SX9512/SX9513 Family of capacitive touch controllers
>>> +  with integrated LED drivers. The device communication is using I2C only.
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - semtech,sx9512
>>> +      - semtech,sx9513
>>
>> Devices are not compatible? What are the differences?
> 
> The SX9513 is a cost-reduced version which does not
> support proximity sensing. With the current support
> of the driver they work identical. Should i add this
> information as a comment?

So they are compatible and this should be expressed via fallback.


> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  '#address-cells':
>>> +    const: 1
>>> +
>>> +  '#size-cells':
>>> +    const: 0
>>> +
>>> +  poll-interval:
>>> +    default: 100
>>> +    description: |
>>
>> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting. Same comment
>> everywhere.
>>
>>> +      The polling interval for touch events in milliseconds.
>>
>> Missing -ms property unit suffix... unless you are using existing
>> property from common schema, but I do not see any reference (and thus
>> unevaluatedProperties at the end).
>>
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> +  "^channel@[0-7]$":
>>> +    $ref: input.yaml#
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Each node represents a channel of the touch controller.
>>> +      Each channel provides a capacitive touch sensor input and
>>> +      an LED driver output.
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      reg:
>>> +        enum: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
>>> +
>>> +      linux,keycodes:
>>> +        maxItems: 1
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          Specifies an array of numeric keycode values to
>>> +          be used for the channels. If this property is
>>> +          omitted, the channel is not used as a key.
>>> +
>>> +      semtech,cin-delta:
>>
>> Use proper unit suffix and express it in pF.
> 
> To represent 2.3 and 3.8 pF, would it be better to represent in
> femtofarad?
> 
>>
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 3
>>> +        default: 3
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          The capacitance delta which is used to detect a touch
>>> +          or release event. The property value is mapped to a
>>> +          farad range between 7pF and 2.3pF internally. The delta
>>> +          becomes smaller the higher the value is.
>>> +
>>> +      semtech,sense-threshold:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        minimum: 0
>>> +        maximum: 255
>>> +        default: 4
>>> +        description: |
>>> +          The threshold value after which the channel detects a touch.
>>> +          Refer to the datasheet for the internal calculation of the
>>> +          resulting touch sensitivity.
>>> +
>>> +      led:
>>
>> I think subnode is here not needed. This should be part of the channel,
>> probably.
> 
> Just to be sure - you mean to have a property "led" upon which instructs
> the channel to be used to drive an LED and include the LED specific
> properties in the node of the channel?
No, I do not mean a property led. I mean that child node should be
folded into parent.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ